Where did the Mueller report obtain the power to “exonerate” anyone?
The Chicago Tribune Perspective article titled, The Mueller report is no vindication of Trump, reports a columnist’s opinion, “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
The Purpose of This Post
Is to question the purpose of the Mueller investigation authority to exonerate anyone.
King Solomon,
An
unfriendly person pursues selfish ends
and against all sound judgment starts quarrels.
2 Fools find no
pleasure in understanding
but delight in airing their own opinions.
3 When wickedness
comes, so does contempt,
and with shame comes reproach.
4 The words of the
mouth are deep waters,
but the fountain of wisdom is a rushing stream.
In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right,
until someone comes forward and
cross-examines. (Proverbs Chapter 18))
What’s My Point?
In a Citizen Tom Post, he made a comment about the statement in regards to “exonerate” of this issue as follows:
@Scatter wisdom
Sad describes it. Mueller appointed a bunch of Democrat lawyers to help him because he is a Trump partisan? Because Mueller is a Trump partisan, Mueller’s team hounded anyone they could who had anything to do with Trump into jail and/or bankruptcy, and to add “credibility”, the Mueller Team indicted Russians they were unprepared and never intended to prosecute? In his report, Mueller makes the point of saying he could not exonerate Trump of the charge of obstruction of justice because he is a Trump partisan?
When are people going to figure out a prosecutor cannot exonerate anyone? We don’t expect prosecutors to prove a negative. That’s not logical.
Mueller’s job, supposedly, was to find evidence that Trump conspired with the Russians to steal the election. Instead of evidence against Trump, Mueller “found” the Golden Showers dossier, and he ignored the fraudulent nature of this “evidence”. Why? That was evidence against Democrats and corrupt officials.
In My Opinion,
If you take the time to discern the authority of Mueller, isn’t Citizen Tom’s comment a valid common-sense logical observation?
As for what Congress wants to now do, that was not proven after 25 million dollars and numerous investigation times, witnesses, subpoenas, reports etc. etc., perhaps Congress needs to “get a life,” and start making suggestions how to solve problems of the USA and make suggestions what they propose to do so voters can discern who to vote for in 2020.
If Interested,
Read the Articles in the Source Links below.
You Decide
Should Congress do something else with their time in office other than to complain about Trump who has now been proven to have won the election because voters got fed up with “empty suit politicians?
Should the Chicago Tribune read and take the advice in Proverbs Chapter 18 which appears to apply to their Perspective.
Regards and good will blogging.
Source Links
Chicago Tribune
Citizen Tom
Empty Suit Politicians
https://rudymartinka.com/2016/11/07/king-solomon-and-empty-suit-politicians/
Proverbs Chapter 18
Rudy u Martinka 
Seems that, if Mueller said this exactly as reported by Barr, where’s any exoneration? Seems Mueller is simply reporting that his summation is that while there is no direct evidence to suggest Trump has committed a crime, this alone does not exonerate him. What’s the problem with that? Mueller is not exonerating anyone unless he’s presenting his opinion of the facts uncovered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Doug
I “feel” you must have robbed a bank, killed someone, raped several children, stepped on a puppy, and kicked a kitten. Otherwise, some prosecutor somewhere would have exonerated you.
Now do you see the problem?
You don’t like Trump? Nobody says you must, but we don’t accuse people of crimes just because we don’t like them. Yet that is what happened to Trump.
@Rudy
Thanks for the honor of including my comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tom,
Honor was mine. Your remark was an eye opener, in my opinion, Check out my reply to Doug.
Regards and good will blogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doug, Tom
Prosecutors are supposed to provide evidence for a criminal offense. Trump has been accused by politicians, never charged with any offense.
How then can he be exonerated from an accusation if he was not guilty of a crime?
Tom’s logic is correct, a political party is doing the same thing to Trump as was technically done to Jesus Christ.
Pontius Pilate let a mob led by power hungry High Priests convict him even though he was innocent.
The politicians and Trump haters want to do the same to Trump, crucify him with negative opinions to win the next election.
Check out my post titled, King Solomon, Washington Post Memory Folly, and the statement made before the last election,
“For Democrats, every waking moment……to gain control of the House in November.” As for Dreamers………. they can wait.”
Well his “prophesy was fulfilled,” the Dems won the House in the last election.
Will they win the 2020 White House?
Yes, if people allow them to crucify Trump, perhaps?
In other words, if voters allow themselves to believe Trump was exonerated or vindicated, the implication was that he was guilty of something.
When in fact, logically the only thing he is guilty of is winning the election and being falsely accused by “High Priest Politicians” inciting a mob of voters.
I guess though that logic doesn’t apply in politics, perhaps. It didn’t apply to Jesus Christ either when he told the truth to a bunch of power-hungry High Priests.
Regards and good will blogging..
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m lost here with all this “exoneration” stuff. Mueller stated (through Barr) that collusion was out but neither was he exonerated from (presumably) other stuff yet to be revealed if we ever get to see the crazy report. Where’s any specific accusations fro Mueller’s report thus far? What’s the problem?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doug,
Take my advice, quit watching whatever news sources you have been watching that have been feeding you tier propaganda for the last two years.
In time you will understand.
In my opinion, if you don’t stop smoking, your lungs will never be in the pink again.
. Same as if you keep listening to propaganda…………
Regards and good will blogging.
.
LikeLike
Tom,
Thanks for the link. it is sad to consider that our great nation needs to consider that much of what we have been taught to believe in the government can no longer be trusted.
We are going away for the weekend to enjoy a family confirmation celebration.
Confirmation is a holy trust to be celebrated.
Regards and good will blogging.
LikeLike