Is there statistic evidence of a winkey -wonky election result?
Definition of wonky (Entry 2 of 2)
2chiefly British : AWRY, WRONG
The Purpose of This Post
To relate an ancient proverb to the statistics of the 2020 Election Results,
King Solomon
He who winks his eye is planning intrigue; he who purses his lips has completed mischief. (Proverb 16:30)
What’s My Point?
Anyone who studied Business Statistics understands the theories of the normal curve to help discern statistical results, or Benford’s Law (Mathematics).
I read a blog titled: Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law (Mathematics) which stated.
“Benford’s law or the first-digit law, is used to check if a set of numbers are naturally occurring or manually fabricated. It has been applied to detect the voting frauds in Iranian 2009 election and various other applications including forensic investigations.”
My point is there is the results of the statistics curve results reminded me of both the above proverb.
In My Opinion
President Trump is wise to follow Hillary Clinton’s advice not to concede this election based on the wink-wonky statistical results.
A Citizen Tom Blog post titled: Trump Campaign Legal Team Holds Press Conference in DC 11/19/20
If Interested
Read the Source Links below
You Decide
Does the statistics, and proverb appear to perhaps indicate the possibility of political intriguers?
Regards and goodwill blogging.
Source Links
Benford’s Law (Mathematics)
Citizen Tom – Trump Team
Hillary Clinton’s Advice
https://rudymartinka.com/2020/11/06/trump-listening-to-hillarys-advice-king-solomon-blog/
Rudy u Martinka 
Was there fraud? It seems all too likely it was. When politicians refuse to let everyone see what they are doing ( no poll watchers, for example), that is a bad sign, especially when it is illegal.
Don’t know much about Benford’s Law, but it doesn’t make much difference at this point. Deviations from Benford’s Law don’t prove fraud. At best, the deviations suggest fraud. We already have such indicators. The effort to push something as foolish as voting by mail is astonishingly foolish. Using computers to the extent we have in our elections is just asking for trouble. The whole idea of volunteer election officers and poll watchers is to validate the absence of hanky-panky. So, we do everything in a black box?
LikeLiked by 1 person