Was the Supreme Court decision really a rebuke or just a political opinion of a reporter?
The Chicago Tribune article titled: In rejecting election lawsuit that sought to throw out 20 million votes in 4 key States, Supreme Court justice deliver a rebuke to GOP, reported this statement:
“Through their explicit endorsements or complicity of silence, much of the GOP leadership now shares responsibility for the quixotic attempt to ignore the nation’s founding principles and engineer a different verdict from the one voter cast in November.”
The Purpose of This Post
Is to relate an ancient proverb and idiom to this reporter’s opinion along with a news article to consider about why GOP legislators may be rightfully concerned about the integrity of the 2020 election,
King Solomon
The wise store up knowledge, but the mouth of a fool invites ruin. (Proverb 10:14)
What’s My Point?
The Supreme Court did not rebuke anyone. What they did instead is refuse to hear the suit of the State of Texas on grounds which are mumbo jumbo to laymen.
The reporter used the word rebuke which is his opinion which is not based on knowledge and more like a fool rant which needs correction for reporting a misleading statement.
My point is there may indeed be legitimate concerns by the GOP legislators about how shoddy the election was conducted in a rushed last minute unconstitutional manner to process for the first-time use of millions of mailed in ballots.
For example, “Wisconsin does not have signature matching laws, so it doesn’t matter how a voter signs their name, as long as it’s on their return envelope.“
In My Opinion
Perhaps this idiom best describes the real reason for the GOP legislators concerns about the 2020 election.
“Where’s there is smoke there must be a fire.”
Sad.
If Interested
Read the Source Links below.
You Decide
How confident are you about the fairness and accuracy of the validity of the 2020 election that all the claims of voter fraud are “baseless claims?” Even though hundreds of thousands of ballots processed in Wisconsin were not matched to the voter’s registration signatures?
Is a news headline misleading when it states a reporter’s opinion instead of the actual news report?
Who in your opinion based on the signature matching issue alone more likely “to ignore the nation’s founding principles?”
Regards and goodwill blogging.
Source Links
Wisconsin Absentee Ballots
https://www.nbc15.com/2020/09/29/correcting-absentee-ballots-in-wisconsin/
Previous Post
SCOTUS Mumbo JumboSCOTUS Mumbo Jumbo, However? King Solomon Blog – Rudy u Martinka (rudymartinka.com)
Rudy u Martinka 
Interesting there is no signature matching provision in the Wisconsin law.
Have a stunning Sunday.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Michael,
Interesting, or the opposite of interesting, meaning “Opposite of arousing little or no interest”
Or perhaps, the real meaning is a “fair election” is of “no interest” in Wisconsin?
Sad message for our Nation to discern on Sunday or any day in my opinion.
Regards amd goodwill blogging.
LikeLike
Again, Rudy, where’s the evidence? More to the Trumpian point… how many thousands are in your conspiracy?
Try this out for a bit of self-analysis…
https://randompontifications.com/2020/12/12/what-makes-conspiracies-so-believable-to-so-many-people/
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doug, you asked
“Again, Rudy, where’s the evidence?”
I’m no lawyer, however I can still remember in my experience in police training a term “prima face evidence, we were trained to preserve if we came upon a crime scene.
“Evidence adequate to establish a fact or raise a presumption of fact unless refuted.”
So far, none of the courts have refuted the evidence. Rather they are constrained from accepting prima face evidence because there is no practical way to present evidence if no one will admit they committed the crime.
Your old sister city of Chicago is a prime example of how courts are restrained from convicting suspects who are shooting and murdering victims in the thousands every year. The conviction rate of crimes in Chicago is less than 10 percent.
In Civil law, when two parities cannot agree and if a solution is not found, a bankruptcy or long standoff will result in harm will force the parties to agree to an arbitrator to make a decision.
This is what should take place because of the first time use of millions of ballots in States that readily admit they did not verify ballots and hasty changes were made that violate State constitutional laws.
As you know I like to associate proverb and idioms to specific news reports’
The two that this scenario remind me about government politicians is the one about “a person who buries his head in the sand” because perhaps the rewired of four years of power is too great aa price than their conscience.
However, the one I most think of every time I read the details of the 202o election is this one.
“If it looks like a skunk, walks like a skunk, and smells like a skunk, it must be a skunk.”
Frankly, the 2020 election smells to high heaven in my opinion, and the result will be another four years of political divisiveness instead of what the founding founders envisioned when they sacrificed to establish our Republic.
Again, I am not a lawyer.
Sad
Regards and goodwill blogging.
LikeLike
There is also another adage I think you will recall.. the “Rule of Reasonableness”. Meaning.. ask yourself… what would it take someone, some group, some villains against democracy.. what would it take to pull off all these alleged conspiracies.. nationally ow just in Wisconsin, Rudy? I mean, really think it out.. the logistics, the communications, what people to “win” over to your side to contribute.. how to keep it all a secret… how to keep people quiet after it all was over and not want instant fame on some news program… how the actual plan would be carried out away from cameras and watchful eye from other observers.. just think about it. If you think in that context… the apply the rule of reasonableness to it actually working… with in Wisconsin or all over the nation.
Then get back to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Doug,
Come on Doug, I believe deep down in your mind you agreed with the. Logic I
LikeLike