What is Georgia going to do to verify ballot signatures in the Senate runoff election?
The Chicago Tribune – Star Tribune – AP -article titled: GOP voters ready for Georgia runoffs amid Trump claims, reported this statement:
“What a fool Governor @BrianKempGA of Georgia is,” Trump tweeted.
A Gateway Pundit report article titled: BREAKING: Georgia Senate Issues New Statement on Election Fraud — Challenge Shady Raffensperger’s Deal with Democrats on Ballot Signatures, begs the question:
What is Georgia going to do different, and legally detailed, in the upcoming Senate runoff election?
The Purpose of This Post
Is to relate an ancient proverb and idiom to the question before the election to avoid the same fiasco revelations in the November 3, election that has destroyed trust in the USA elections.
As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly. (Proverb 26:11)
“The devil is in the detail” is an idiom that refers to a catch or mysterious element hidden in the details, meaning that something might seem simple at a first look but will take more time and effort to complete than expected
What’s My Point?
My work experience was in private industry which adhered to detailed Engineering and Quality Control standards by various groups to assure quality and resolve disputes that arise. It worked very well because if disputes arose and wound up in Courts, there were written standards of evidence which would take precedence over verbal arguments in Civil Law Court.
However, in the USA, States make their own rules on how to conduct an election which the Supreme Court will not interfere. In a previous post, I made a point that the USA Electoral College is comprised of 50 States and is only as strong as the weakest link.
My point is Georgia has admitted in the November 3 election that it was impossible to verify signatures of the ballots. Wisconsin has no laws to require ballots be verified to voter registration. So, what are the details of the election standards that will be adhered to in the upcoming Senate runoff election?.
For example, will there be an agreed standard used on the settings of signature matches on the machines used to compare ballot signatures instead of arbitrary minimum settings.
Will a notice be sent to every voter if their ballot is rejected by the machine and what will be the timeframes?
In other words, will there be detailed written standards rules for government administered elections.
And why in a Nation which a Carter- Baker study made twenty years ago never been agreed to in the Republic of the USA to avoid the citizens of the USA and world consider the USA elections standard are being administer to the same degree of quality as a Banana Republic?
In My Opinion
Read the Source Links below
Why are there no news reports on this issue?
Will the Georgia runoff election be conducted in the same manner as the 3000 year old King Solomon proverb best sums up in the proverb about how a dog returns to its vomit same as a fool returns to his folly?.
Regards and goodwill blogging.
Chicago Tribune – Star Tribune – AP
Wikipedia – The Devil is in the Detail
Carter -Baker Report