Who in truth, is bullying who?
An AP report titled County cuts deal to end fight over Arizona Senate subpoena, reported the following statements:
“The Senate will finally get the answers to questions asked for in subpoenas issued to the County months ago,” Fann said in a statement.
“We’re dealing with bullies,” Gallardo said. “There is nothing we can do to satisfy any of the (GOP) Senators” pursuing the audit.
The Purpose of This Post
Is to relate an ancient wisdom verse to this conundrum.
Definition of bullying – Merriam Webster
: abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful, etc.: the actions and behavior of a bully
: prone to or characterized by overbearing mistreatment and domination of others
Obey the king’s command, I say, because you took an oath before God. (Ecclesiastes 8:2)
What’s My Point?
In a Democrat Republic a King has been replaced with legislators’ voters given the power to represent the voters who choose the “who” to represent their interests in Government.
Every elected representative takes an oath in office to obey and enforce the laws.
My point is to wonder why there has been so much resistance to a lawful mandated audit to determine if the 2020 election accusations of fraud could be substantiated as to being true or false.
An election where some States legislators using the Covid pandemic as a reason to change voting methods without approval by the State Legislators and laws to allow massive mail in ballots instead of the lawful approved State procedures and voting laws.
Or in other words, who has been bullying who to stall the findings of the audit by disobeying the lawful subpoena issued by a lawful Government order?
In My Opinion
Both sides or political parties should want to know if the 2020 election was accurate.
Why that does not seem to be the case is the conundrum which needs to be discerned rather than voters having to continue to read or hear all kinds of political opinions, insinuations, defensive statements or accusations about the audit of the 2020 election which is a lawful pursuit as provided by legislation. For example, laws that ballots be held for a year rather than discarded….
Why should any governing body not want to know if the 2020 election was indeed “the most secure election in history” as has been claimed by election officials and various news sources and articles ever since it began in April, five months ago?
Which took up to now for both sides to agree after a series of suits and refusal by government voting officials to allow the routers which were connected to the internet to be examined in the audit to find out if they were hacked.
Are voters the real victims of the “abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable?
Should any voters “prone to or characterized by overbearing mistreatment and domination of others” especially any government official who refuses a lawful subpoena after taking an oath to obey the laws?
Should any voters be ‘bullied’ or ‘satisfied’ by any Government voting officials, legislators, and nonobjective news media because the “who” (voters) are interested in finding the truth of this issue. a first time in history extensive audit of 2.1 million votes to ever take place after an election?
Is it possible and if so why, are voters seemingly treated as ‘Kings’ by government officials or legislators before an election?
Read the Source Links below a previous post on this issue.
Regards and goodwill blogging.
Previous Posts – Arizona Recount News