Who would King Solomon test to judge as guilty for the deaths in this trial?
The jury will soon decide if Rittenhouse should be found innocent or guilty.
However, what test will have been presented to the jurors similar to the test presented to the mothers to cut the disputed baby in half and give one half to each mother. Or in other words, require love of the true mother to surface by their true mother being willing to sacrifice and give up her baby so it would live rather than die?
Or what has love got to do with it? – is the test King Solomon presented to the mothers in order for the truth of the matter 3000 years ago, be compared to the truth of the Rittenhouse trial in our contemporary times.
The Purpose of This Post
Is to relate ancient wisdom verses of King Solomon, a Bible excerpt, to discern the real test needed to judge the evidence of this conundrum of guilt or innocence of Rittenhouse.
King Solomon
He who passes by and meddles in a quarrel not his own
Is like one who takes a dog by the ears. (Proverb 26, 17)
Bible Verses
Excerpt- Judge Not Heresy by David Cloud
The apostle John wrote, “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try [test, judge] the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1). Again, he wrote, “For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh… If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, RECEIVE HIM NOT into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds” (2 John 7, 10-11). Tis Scrip
What’s My Point?
Both Rittenhouse and the victims travelled to Kenosha to technically ‘meddle’ into the quarrel.
Which one was a meddler and what test of love or doctrine should be judged by their actions they displayed on that evening in my point?
In My Opinion,
Something is very wrong is taking place in our Nation when people believe they need to buy guns to protect themselves from people ‘meddling” by using guns or participating in violent demonstrations and destruction of property of innocent community members.
While at the same time, TV and movies are portraying heroes to act with violence as a means to accomplish a fair and just society to youth.
At the same time, the Supreme Court ruling that it is unlawful to teach youth in public schools the wisdom and love in the Bible.
While at the same time voters keep electing legislators to oppose school choice or school vouchers to allow parents to choose to send their children to private religious schools that most mayors, politicians, and 40 percent of public-school teachers send their children to attend.
If interested,
I recommend anyone interested in judging for themselves this trial, listen to the lawyers’ ending summations.
You Decide
What good or evil ‘spirits’ are being portrayed and allowed into our houses from false prophets meddling and portraying to youth that their actions are heroic or normal to make use of guns, drugs, and violence instead of love and wisdom in the Bible should really be on trial for what led up to what occurred in Kenosha?
Are ancient beliefs in use of wisdom and love to discern the good or evil actions and opinions being expressed by mouths, words, or deeds, proofs of true mother’s ‘flesh’ valid tests to help determine the guilt or innocence for everyone?
Is this quarrel really ‘not of our own’ that is occurring in our Nation?
Regards and goodwill blogging.
Rudy u Martinka 
My reply I posted on another blog here….
https://statelymcdanielmanor.wordpress.com/2021/11/15/the-rittenhouse-case-9-closing/
“Here’s to the far greater point of this case that will last well beyond it. The more armed “nutjobs” (more on that moniker in a bit) from either side that show up to these kinds of civil affairs, be they self-proclaimed “defenders of the realm”, vigilantes, EMT wannabes who are armed “just in case” they need to kill someone while they save lives, militias of all shapes and sizes…. when everyone is armed that go to “freedom of speech” civil unrest demonstrations like that in Kenosha… no one will recognize friend or foe. Someone will shoot in self-defense and the next guy assumes the first shooter is an “active shooter” so the second shooter shoots the first shooter. From there the cards come tumbling down.
This will all get worse with each civil demonstration in the future. I can easily see this kind of thing ending up being militia against militia…. which we all can see, a militia is nothing more than a gang pretending (or re-living) to be soldiers.
There was a time when combat medics went into combat unarmed. Why would an EMT need a weapon in a civil riot? Why wouldn’t an EMT in any civil capacity be marked in some fashion?
From Wiki…
“In modern times, most combat medics carry a personal weapon, to be used to protect themselves and the wounded or sick in their care. By convention this is limited to small caliber firearms such as 9mm pistols.”
Guns and the “newer” revised carry-at-will gun laws are an initiation for NUTJOBS (by my definition, people who have lost the ability at common sense judgement that owning a firearm and being allowed to prance around open society with it, means you should do so to assert your own behavioral dysfunctions with a tool of power over others). Another reason for a national mental health program.
Seems to me if anyone goes to those things with a firearm of any type (and we all know that prancing around with an “assault weapon” is presenting a outward image to others… a concealed handgun is not as dramatic a statement) is going there with the intent to kill someone… “hopefully” in self-defense.
It’s a sick state of affairs.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Doug,
Thanks for your comment. I read your post and apparently you have been actively engaged in following and gathering details more than me. I just listened to the summations and believe we both may have come to the same conclusion you stated”
“It’s a sick state of affairs.”
Again, I recommend anyone interested not to read any news opinions and instead listen to the summations.
As after listening, I agree if anyone wants to consider why everyone is buying guns, it is as you said.
Because of “a sick state of affairs,”
all the result of a Nation idolizing the wrong Gods as Citizen Tom is explains in his current posting in his latest post, we are listening to, in my opinion.
WHOSE SIDE ARE THEY ON? — PART 2 – Citizen Tom
Regards and goodwill blogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love this!!! I’ve tweeted out and will continue to share as we pray righteousness will prevail! Indeed, it is a sick state of affairs. But as you reminded us, this is what happens when we remove God from life. My opinion: Only death and chaos remain. Praying for this young man, his family and all the others who lost loved ones and those injured. We must care for everyone as we learn to love our neighbors as ourselves, for those of us who love God first!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Debbie L,
Thank you for your comment and wise discernment of the root cause and point of this sad affair.
“But as you reminded us, this is what happens when we remove God from life. “
Regards amd goodwill blogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the reference.
Rittenhouse could no doubt have use some instruction in wisdom. However, I suspect his worst crime is wanting to be some kind of superhero. When I was a boy I learn wisdom from comic books and D&D fantasies. I fear his sources were about as good.
That said, his was a clear case of self defense. Never should have gone to trial. The only good thing about all this is that prosecutor’s career is probably at an end. At least, I hope so.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Tom,
I hope so too.
Regards and goodwill blogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whenever I hear people express their relief upon learning that someone has been charged with a reviled crime — ‘Did they catch him? They did? Well, that’s a load off the mind!’ — I mentally hear the phrase, ‘We’ll give ’im a fair trial, then we’ll hang ’im.’ If I point out the person may be wrongly accused and is being railroaded, I could receive the erroneous refrain, ‘Well if he’s truly innocent, he has nothing to worry about.’
It’s why I strongly feel the news-media should refrain from publishing the identity of people charged with a crime — especially one of a repugnant nature, for which they are jailed pending trial (as is typically done) — until at least after they’ve been convicted.
Considering the serious flaws, even corruption, in the law-enforcement and justice system — great injustices committed, both hidden and exposed — no one should have their name permanently tarnished and life potentially ruined because the news-media insists upon immediately running a breaking story. To me, it all epitomizes an unjust presumption of guilt.
LikeLiked by 2 people