Will the Supreme Court ruling help solve the present redistricting “ugly configurations” based on politicians racial gerrymandering?

Or, will the Supreme Court Case make it impossible to stop racial gerrymandering mapping by politicians to obtain power by use of race instead of one man one vote??

For example, the Chicago Tribune has written a number of articles on the current Chicago Ward wars taking place by politicians to obtain power in a between Blacks and Mexicans

In other words, politicians’ weird configurations “must necessarily prioritize race first and consider other race-neutral factors second.”.  

The Purpose of This Post

To relate an ancient wisdom verse to this issue which resulted from the 1963 Voting Right s Act became a tool for politicians to obtain and maintain power of legislative office based on race, color of skin, or ethnic name recognition instead of our Nation’s founders’ visions of a Democrat Republic based on one man one vote.

King Solomon Article Excerpt

Equity, Not Equality, Must Be the Goal, the Rule, and the Finality of All Laws

The Old Testament provides an excellent, though rather disturbing, example of the distinction between equity and equality. It is found in 1 Kings 3:16-28, wherein is the account of two mothers, both of whom are prostitutes (v. 16), who went to King Solomon to settle a dispute between them involving two babies: one dead, one living. 

“As the situation unfolds, it becomes apparent that the two discordant women possess vastly contrasting paradigms of what justice is. One viewed it in terms of outcome (equality), whereas the other viewed it in terms of truth (equity). “

What’s My Point?

When the Supreme Court changed from one man one vote to allow race to be a factor to determine redistricting maps, the truth and reality of the ruling is it became bcame a tool for politicians to obtain and retain power in office by using race card with complicated rules to prove political gerrymandering…

For Example, Explanations Source Link Excerpts

“The word (equity) carries with it the concept of judging with a straight line, one that is devoid of ethical or moral defects, irregularities, or deformities, such as partiality, prejudice, or bias”

“Before such a lawsuit can proceed, however, Cooper v. Harris (2017) requires these plaintiffs to prove that it is actually possible to draw two such districts without having to rely on ugly, misshapen districts that could stretch across much of the state.”

Anyone who reads or studies USA history will readily recognize the truth of the inequality is of man toward Blacks and slavery which occurred over time on the issues of voting laws. And that the Supreme Court rulings of 1963 were needed then to promote voting rights. However, their ruling on the issue of race to prevent o gerrymander voting districts was based on equality Jas resulted over time for politicians to obtain power based on race instead of one man one vote to address community and society issues.

The ruling has opened the door for politicians to obtain power under the guise of equality instead of equity and the result to gerrymander map configurations to resemble the opposite of a “straight-line judgements to prevent political gerrymander maps.in our Democrat Republic.

For Example, Explanations from Source Excerpts

“The word (equity) carries with it the concept of judging with a straight line, one that is devoid of ethical or moral defects, irregularities, or deformities, such as partiality, prejudice, or bias”

“Before such a lawsuit can proceed, however, Cooper v. Harris (2017) requires these plaintiffs to prove that it is actually possible to draw two such districts without having to rely on that could stretch across much of the state.”

In My Opinion

To understand the consequences requires esoteric discernment of the differences in justice between equality explained in the Source Link articles below titled. Equity, Not Equality, Must Be the Goal, the Rule, and the Finality of All Laws

Anyone who reads or listens to the news being reported daily about the issues of racial divisiveness taking place in the USA, needs to recognize that the core issue is because of the Supreme Court 1953 ruling.

In other words, the truth of wisdom is justice based on inequality of races or wealth is not justice of equity.

“And yet interestingly, if not ironically, therein lies the rub for many social justice equalitarians today, namely, that equity is no guarantee of outcome, and for social justice equalitarians outcome is everything—everything.”

“The word equity in Psalm 9:8 is the Hebrew noun meyshar (מֵישָׁר). It is an architectural term that denotes straightness, levelness, and evenness in measurement. 

If Interested

Read the Source Links below

You Decide

Is now the right time for warring to the Supreme Court to restore truth of equity justice by reversing the 1963 ruling on the issue of reprimanding based on race?

Would a simple requirement of mandating all districts maps to only be straight line districts mapping configurations instead of the “ugly, misshapen districts” drawn up by politicians to make use of race cards instead of one man one vote as explained in previous posts on this issue?

Regards and goodwill blogging

Source Links

MSN Supreme Court Case Could Make It Impossible to stop racial gerrymanders

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-new-supreme-court-case-could-make-it-nearly-impossible-to-stop-racial-gerrymanders/ar-AATmBoa

  Equity, Not Equality, Must Be the Goal, the Rule, and the Finality of All Laws

Previous Posts Links

Tribalism

WARds Dance in Chicago